Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Citation
- Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Parent Document
- Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 2012-03-27
Other Sections in This Document (51)
- Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
- Section 31-51q
- Section 31-51q
- Section 31-51q
- Section 31-51q
- Section 31-51q
- Section 31-51q
- Section 31-51q
- Section 31-51q
- Section 31-51q
- Section 31-51q
- Section 31-51q
- Section 31-51q
- Section 31-51q
- Section 31-51q
- Section 31-51q
- Section 31-51q
Full Text
526 charsThe self-represented plaintiff, Li Li, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendants, Canberra Industries, Packard BioScience (Packard), Perkin-Elmer Life Sciences, Darren Lee, Roberta Tyska (formerly Roberta Kuhn), Mark Schmeizl, Wayne Richardson, Eugene Della Vecchia, Richard McKeman and Emery G. Olcott. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants as to her common-law and statutory claims of wrongful discharge. 1