Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)

Citation: Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Parent Document: Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Jurisdiction: Connecticut (state)
Effective Date: 2012-03-27
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2295755/li-li-v-canberra-industries/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (51)

Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q

Full Text

549 chars

The plaintiff worked with her next supervisor, Lee, until December, 1999. In a written performance review dated April 26,2000, Lee assigned the plaintiff an overall rating of “unacceptable,” and stated that the plaintiff “came into my group complaining.” Although “her attitude improved as did the quality of her work,” her improvement faded within months and “[s]he became argumentative . . . the quality of her work decline[d]. . . [and] [i]t was decided it was best for the company if we moved her to a position on [another] product line . . . .”