Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)

Citation: Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Parent Document: Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Jurisdiction: Connecticut (state)
Effective Date: 2012-03-27
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2295755/li-li-v-canberra-industries/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (51)

Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q

Full Text

594 chars

The plaintiffs next supervisor, Richardson, sent her a review of her performance via e-mail on February 29, 2000, after having supervised her for two and one-half months. Richardson rated the plaintiff poorly and commented that “[i]f improvement doesn’t happen, other disciplinary action may be taken up to and including termination.” The review also stated that the plaintiff was being transferred to a position under the supervision of Schmeizl, who would establish goals for her and review her performance after ninety days. The plaintiff was placed on probation for a period of ninety days.