Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)

Citation: Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Parent Document: Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Jurisdiction: Connecticut (state)
Effective Date: 2012-03-27
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2295755/li-li-v-canberra-industries/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (51)

Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Li Li v. Canberra Industries, 39 A.3d 789 (2012)
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q
Section 31-51q

Full Text

464 chars

exception, the plaintiff has the burden of pleading and proving that his dismissal occurred for a reason violating public policy. . . . [E]ven with respect to questions of motive, intent and good faith, the party opposing summary judgment must present a factual predicate for his argument in order to raise a genuine issue of fact.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Yancey v. Connecticut Life & Casualty Ins. Co., supra, 68 Conn. App. 559-60.