Section 1803

Citation: Section 1803
Parent Document: Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2005-10-13
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2264118/bohbot-v-santa-monica-rent-cont... ↗

Other Sections in This Document (121)

Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Section 1806
Section 1806
Section 1806
Section 1806
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803

Full Text

500 chars

The Board represents that the Regulation was adopted in order to “address abuses by landlords who file successive attempts to evict the same tenant for owner-occupancy. Prior to its adoption, tenants under these circumstances were forced to repeatedly defend against eviction in cases where the landlord would withdraw the suit prior to judgment if he/she believed the tenant might prevail. In response, [the Regulation] was adopted as a substantive defense to harassment by continual litigation.” 11