Section 1803

Citation: Section 1803
Parent Document: Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2005-10-13
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2264118/bohbot-v-santa-monica-rent-cont... ↗

Other Sections in This Document (121)

Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Section 1806
Section 1806
Section 1806
Section 1806
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803

Full Text

418 chars

at pp. 149-151.) “Unlike the limitations imposed by the [rent control law] upon chargeable rents and upon the grounds for eviction, which can affect summary repossession proceedings only by making substantive defenses available to the tenant, the [mandated pre-eviction procedures] raise[] procedural barriers between the landlord and the judicial proceeding.” (Id. at p. 151.) Similarly, in Fisher v. City of Berkeley