Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
- Citation
- Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
- Parent Document
- Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
- Jurisdiction
- California (state)
- Effective Date
- 2005-10-13
Other Sections in This Document (121)
- Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
- Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
- Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
- Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
- Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
- Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
- Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
- Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
- Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
- Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
- Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
- Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
- Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
- Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
- Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
- Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
- Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
- Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
- Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
- Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
- Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
- Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
- Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
- Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
- Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
- Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
- Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
- Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
- Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
- Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
- Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
- Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
- Section 1806
- Section 1806
- Section 1806
- Section 1806
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 2004
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
- Section 1803
Full Text
139 chars39 Cal.App.4th at p. 1382.) “ ‘Words used in a statute . . . should be given the meaning they bear in ordinary use.’ (Lungren v. Deukmejian