Section 2004

Citation: Section 2004
Parent Document: Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2005-10-13
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2264118/bohbot-v-santa-monica-rent-cont... ↗

Other Sections in This Document (121)

Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Bohbot v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board, 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 827 (2005)
Section 1806
Section 1806
Section 1806
Section 1806
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 2004
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803
Section 1803

Full Text

555 chars

controlled rental units. (§ 1806, former subd. (h).) The RCL also provided that “any landlord who desires to remove a controlled rental unit from the rental housing market by . . . conversion ... is required to obtain a permit from the Board prior to such removal . . . .” (§ 1803, former subd. (t).) The Board was permitted to approve a removal permit only if it found that removal of the unit would not adversely affect the City’s low-income housing supply, if it would be economically infeasible for the landlord to retain and maintain the unit in *466