Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Robert L. Lennon v. United States Theatre Corporation, 920 F.2d 996 (1990)

Citation
Robert L. Lennon v. United States Theatre Corporation, 920 F.2d 996 (1990)
Parent Document
Robert L. Lennon v. United States Theatre Corporation, 920 F.2d 996 (1990)
Effective Date
1990-12-07

Other Sections in This Document (59)

Full Text

563 chars
47 A.2d at 511. But even if we assumed that the landlord’s remarks here, coupled with the initiation of repair efforts, amounted to an undertaking within the meaning of that doctrine, Lennon failed to establish either that U.S. Theatre’s delay amounted to negligence or that he, Lennon, suffered tangible harm as a result. The district court found explicitly that U.S. Theatre “proceeded reasonably” in restoring the roof “once it decided to do so,” and that “Lennon completely failed to establish damages because of U.S. Theatre’s delay.” Memorandum Opinion 6. 4