Cited. 4 CA 423; 5 CA 643; 18 CA 241; 27 CA 635; 35 CA 474; 38 CA 506; 41 CA 1; 44 CA 446; Id., 677. Federal standards reviewed for guidance in enforcing state antidiscrimination statutes; court held that defendant had provided plaintiff with reasonable accommodation. 57 CA 767. Subdiv. (7): There is a public policy against sex discrimination in employment sufficiently expressed in statutory and constitutional law to permit a cause of action for wrongful discharge; although Sec. 46a-51(10) excludes many employers from the requirements of the act, the clear public policy against sex discrimination transcends the exclusion. 64 CA 573. Company may be held liable for discrimination even where decision-making official did not intentionally discriminate if information used by that official in deciding to terminate a worker's employment was filtered through another employee who had a discriminatory motive. 72 CA 212. Subdiv. (1): State's public policy prohibiting discrimination on the basis of disabilities is embodied in Subdiv. 81 CA 726. Subdiv. (7): Trial court's finding of discriminatory practice affirmed, contrary to defendant's assertions, plaintiff's claim of discriminatory practice does not fail merely because evidence offered to prove defendant's violation of subparagraph arose out of an incident that is also arguably within purview of another subparagraph under same statutory subdivision. 88 CA 60. Subsec. establishes a well-defined and dominant public policy against workplace sexual harassment and extends to the actions of an employee. 125 CA 408. There is no claim under Subsec. for person regarded or perceived as disabled by employer. 137 CA 446; judgment reversed, see 314 C. 773.