Cited. 193 C. 558; 195 C. 226; 196 C. 208; 202 C. 601; Id., 609; 211 C. 129; 226 C. 670; 232 C. 91; 236 C. 96; Id., 681; 238 C. 337. Sec. 46a-100 represents an unambiguous waiver of sovereign immunity, authorizing actions against the state for alleged discriminatory employment practices in violation of section; claims properly brought before the commission are outside the cognizance of Claims Commissioner. 291 C. 384.
Cited. 16 CA 379; 40 CA 577. Plaintiff provided no authority or per se rule equating violation of section with intentional infliction of emotional distress and court was not inclined to create such a rule. 61 CA 108. To ensure compliance with the purpose of the Fair Employment Practices Act, a teacher who is discharged for any of the reasons enumerated in Sec. 10-151(d) must be afforded the protections of this section. 142 CA 248. Legislature intended to make state discrimination laws coextensive with the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964; If a plaintiff succeeds in establishing a prima facie case, it creates a rebuttable presumption that the employer intentionally discriminated against the employee, and if a defendant effectively rebuts the presumption of intentional discrimination by articulating a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for the adverse employment action, the plaintiff must persuade the trier of fact, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the defendant's justification for the plaintiff's dismissal was merely pretextual. 211 CA 676. Regardless of the United States Supreme Court's decision in