§ 2
- Citation
- § 2
- Parent Document
- Eunice Samuels, Lorraine Warren v. District of Columbia, 770 F.2d 184 (1985)
- Jurisdiction
- United States (federal)
- Effective Date
- 1985-08-06
Other Sections in This Document (234)
- Eunice Samuels, Lorraine Warren v. District of Columbia, 770 F.2d 184 (1985)
- Eunice Samuels, Lorraine Warren v. District of Columbia, 770 F.2d 184 (1985)
- Eunice Samuels, Lorraine Warren v. District of Columbia, 770 F.2d 184 (1985)
- Eunice Samuels, Lorraine Warren v. District of Columbia, 770 F.2d 184 (1985)
- Eunice Samuels, Lorraine Warren v. District of Columbia, 770 F.2d 184 (1985)
- Eunice Samuels, Lorraine Warren v. District of Columbia, 770 F.2d 184 (1985)
- Eunice Samuels, Lorraine Warren v. District of Columbia, 770 F.2d 184 (1985)
- Eunice Samuels, Lorraine Warren v. District of Columbia, 770 F.2d 184 (1985)
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
Full Text
589 charsThe differential approach to statutory section 1983 claims and implied private rights of action also accords with the history and purposes of section 1983 itself. As the Court has repeatedly emphasized, that statute was expressly designed to alter federal-state relations by creating a special federal remedy for state and municipal violations of federal law. Because Congress feared that state officials would be "antipathetic” to federal rights, it chose to “interpose the federal courts between the States and the people, as guardians of the peoples’ federal rights.” Mitchum v. Foster,