§ 2
- Citation
- § 2
- Parent Document
- Eunice Samuels, Lorraine Warren v. District of Columbia, 770 F.2d 184 (1985)
- Jurisdiction
- United States (federal)
- Effective Date
- 1985-08-06
Other Sections in This Document (234)
- Eunice Samuels, Lorraine Warren v. District of Columbia, 770 F.2d 184 (1985)
- Eunice Samuels, Lorraine Warren v. District of Columbia, 770 F.2d 184 (1985)
- Eunice Samuels, Lorraine Warren v. District of Columbia, 770 F.2d 184 (1985)
- Eunice Samuels, Lorraine Warren v. District of Columbia, 770 F.2d 184 (1985)
- Eunice Samuels, Lorraine Warren v. District of Columbia, 770 F.2d 184 (1985)
- Eunice Samuels, Lorraine Warren v. District of Columbia, 770 F.2d 184 (1985)
- Eunice Samuels, Lorraine Warren v. District of Columbia, 770 F.2d 184 (1985)
- Eunice Samuels, Lorraine Warren v. District of Columbia, 770 F.2d 184 (1985)
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
Full Text
334 charsThe question before us is whether the phrase “and laws,” as used in § 1983, means what it says, or whether it should be limited to some subset of laws. Given that Congress attached no modifiers to the phrase, the plain language of the statute undoubtedly embraces respondents’ claim that petitioners violated the [statute]. Thiboutot,