§ 2
- Citation
- § 2
- Parent Document
- Eunice Samuels, Lorraine Warren v. District of Columbia, 770 F.2d 184 (1985)
- Jurisdiction
- United States (federal)
- Effective Date
- 1985-08-06
Other Sections in This Document (234)
- Eunice Samuels, Lorraine Warren v. District of Columbia, 770 F.2d 184 (1985)
- Eunice Samuels, Lorraine Warren v. District of Columbia, 770 F.2d 184 (1985)
- Eunice Samuels, Lorraine Warren v. District of Columbia, 770 F.2d 184 (1985)
- Eunice Samuels, Lorraine Warren v. District of Columbia, 770 F.2d 184 (1985)
- Eunice Samuels, Lorraine Warren v. District of Columbia, 770 F.2d 184 (1985)
- Eunice Samuels, Lorraine Warren v. District of Columbia, 770 F.2d 184 (1985)
- Eunice Samuels, Lorraine Warren v. District of Columbia, 770 F.2d 184 (1985)
- Eunice Samuels, Lorraine Warren v. District of Columbia, 770 F.2d 184 (1985)
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 966
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 2
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
- § 1437d
Full Text
356 charsat 18-27, 101 S.Ct. at 1540-45. Instead, the Court concluded, the relevant statutory language and extensive legislative history indicated that the policy section of the act before it was only intended as a precatory statement of congressional preference, at most a “nudge in the preferred directions.” Id. at 19, 101 S.Ct. at 1541 (quoting Rosado v. Wyman,