Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Section 45-1561

Citation
Section 45-1561
Parent Document
Habib v. Thurston, 517 A.2d 1 (1986)
Jurisdiction
DC (municipal)
Effective Date
1986-10-30

Other Sections in This Document (332)

Full Text

516 chars
[15] To be consistent, the tenant would have to make the same argument if the landlord had prevailed. Properly interpreted, therefore, the tenant is arguing that, when summary judgment is granted in a notice case, a tenant who has made a timely jury demand for the McNeal hearing always must get back the funds she deposited into the registry, however the possessory action turns out. This argument suggests that a protective order would be useless to the landlord, if not altogether inappropriate, in a notice case.