Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Habib v. Thurston, 517 A.2d 1 (1986)

Citation
Habib v. Thurston, 517 A.2d 1 (1986)
Parent Document
Habib v. Thurston, 517 A.2d 1 (1986)
Jurisdiction
DC (municipal)
Effective Date
1986-10-30

Other Sections in This Document (332)

Full Text

330 chars
In sum, the information sought in interrogatories 3, 7, 9 and 10 was discoverable under Rule 26(b)(1). The trial court, therefore, did not abuse its discretion in awarding attorney’s fees under Rule 37(a)(4), after granting the motion to compel, since the landlord proffered no substantial justification for refusing to answer. 2.