DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Habib v. Thurston, 517 A.2d 1 (1986)

Citation
Habib v. Thurston, 517 A.2d 1 (1986)
Parent Document
Habib v. Thurston, 517 A.2d 1 (1986)
Jurisdiction
DC (municipal)
Effective Date
1986-10-30
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1995493/habib-v-thurston/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (332)

Full Text

479 chars 
Both parties did so in late March. The tenant elaborated her earlier argument; the landlord maintained, as he does on appeal, that “[i]n dismissing her counterclaims and claims for abatement of rent” (without prejudice), the tenant “has conceded that she had no interest in the monies paid into the registry of the Court, since she had used and occupied the premises during [that] period_” Accordingly, “no further hearing is necessary to determine who is entitled to the money.”