Section 47a-23
- Citation
- Section 47a-23
- Parent Document
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 2013-07-16
Other Sections in This Document (45)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
Full Text
549 charsThe defendants next seem to argue that the following finding made by the court was clearly erroneous: after the death of the plaintiffs husband “and without the plaintiffs permission, the defendants changed the locks on the property and the plaintiff had difficulty entering her property.” The defendants highlight Steven Polian-sky’s testimony that the locks on the gate to the property were changed while Andrew Poliansky was alive. The defendants state in their brief that the lock issue “may very well be irrelevant to a summary process action.”