Section 47a-23
- Citation
- Section 47a-23
- Parent Document
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 2013-07-16
Other Sections in This Document (45)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
Full Text
299 charsThe defendants last claim that “they were treated far differently at trial than the plaintiff was treated at trial. Evidence that the plaintiff was allowed to present was not allowed to be rebutted by the defendant. This created a substantially uneven playing field for the defendants.” We disagree.