Section 47a-23
- Citation
- Section 47a-23
- Parent Document
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 2013-07-16
Other Sections in This Document (45)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
Full Text
598 charsWhether Kyle Poliansky was a party to a prior dismissed summary process action does not affect the *198validity of the present notice to quit. It does not matter whether he received notice, prior to the service of a notice to quit on April 28, 2011, that his permission to use the property had terminated, because such notice is not required. See part I of this opinion. The court found that, like the other defendants, he had been given prior permission to use the property, and that permission was later revoked. Accordingly, § 47a-23 (a) (3) was properly cited as grounds for the notice to quit.