Section 47a-23
- Citation
- Section 47a-23
- Parent Document
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 2013-07-16
Other Sections in This Document (45)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Pollansky v. Pollansky, 144 Conn. App. 188 (2013)
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
Full Text
462 charsKyle Poliansky argues that, although he was not a minor when served with the notice to quit dated April 27, 2011, “he was not a party to the dismissed prior action, he never received any written or verbal communication by the plaintiff that she wanted him gone, and he too received his first notice with the April 27, 2011 notice to quit.” Apparently, he argues that had he been a party to a prior action, he would have known that permission had been terminated.