Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Citation
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Parent Document
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 2025-12-23
Other Sections in This Document (36)
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
- Seramonte CT, LLC v. Blau (2025)
Full Text
1,257 charsThe first occasion of Blau’s threatening conduct
involved the plaintiff’s attorney in a courthouse. Blau
interrupted a separate summary process matter involv-
ing the plaintiff’s attorney. Blau ‘‘aggressively approached
the plaintiff’s attorney in the hallway and caused her
to nearly fall and injure herself, but for her being
‘caught’ by her cocounsel.’’ The second occasion of
Blau’s threatening conduct involved the employees of
a towing company that the plaintiff utilized to enforce
its parking policies at the premises. Specifically, Blau
used ‘‘her vehicle to block the two truck drivers called
to the premises and she screamed vulgarities and used
obscene gestures towards the plaintiff’s contractors.
She accused the owner of the tow truck company of
1
As a result of our conclusion, we need not address the defendants’
additional claim that the trial court improperly concluded that the language
of the attorney’s fees provision in the parties’ lease precluded an award of
such fees to the defendants under § 42-150bb.
Page 2 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL 0, 0