2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)

Citation: 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
Parent Document: 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2022-08-31
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/7861646/2710-sutter-ventures-llc-v-millis/ ↗

Full Text

1,162 chars

32
landlord’s disingenuous use of the right to evict under the Act to
evade the City’s rent control law. Our Legislature has recognized
that requiring relocation assistance payments in non-fault
evictions under the Tenant Protection Act of 2019 serves to deter
abusive non-fault evictions. (Sen. Com. on Judiciary, Analysis of
Assem. Bill 1482, as amended June 28, 2019, p. 9 [TPA relocation
assistance payment requirements for non-fault evictions act as at
least a partial deterrent to a landlord making an end run around
the TPA’s rent caps].)14 As under the TPA, a landlord is less
likely to disingenuously invoke the Act as a just cause for eviction
under the Rent Ordinance if the landlord must pay relocation
assistance benefits, and a maximal deterrent purpose is further
served if the landlord must provide tenants with information
regarding the full scope of the right to relocation assistance
payments, which will enable them to claim the largest available
relocation assistance payment in all circumstances. Because it
did not fully and accurately apprise defendants of the entirety of
“the right to receive payment” encompassed within section 37.9A,

Other Sections in This Document (66)

Full Text