2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)

Citation: 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
Parent Document: 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2022-08-31
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/7861646/2710-sutter-ventures-llc-v-millis/ ↗

Full Text

865 chars

29
of each “Eligible Tenant”; and does not impermissibly burden
landlords. (§ 37.9A, subd. (e)(3)(A)–(C).)12
      Plaintiffs’ termination notice did not fully comply with the
notice requirement at issue. “The right to receive payment”
under section 37.9A, subdivision (e)(3) includes the right to
payment of “a relocation benefit on behalf of each authorized
occupant of the rental unit regardless of the occupant’s age
(‘Eligible Tenant’)[,]” and to additional payments for elderly or
disabled Eligible Tenants. (§ 37.9A, subd. (e)(3)(A), (C).)
Plaintiffs’ termination notice stated on page one, “You have
rights and obligations under [Rent Ordinance] § 37.9A, including,
but not limited to, the right to renew the tenancy if proper
notification is given within 30 days after vacating the unit, and
entitlement to certain relocation payments as described in more

Other Sections in This Document (66)

Full Text