Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)

Citation
2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
Parent Document
2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
Jurisdiction
California (state)
Effective Date
2022-08-31

Other Sections in This Document (66)

Full Text

1,664 chars
3
within any detached physical structure and, in addition, in the
case of any detached physical structure containing three or fewer
rental units, any other rental units on the same lot, and complies
[sic] in full with [Rent Ordinance] § 37.9A and California
Government Code §§ 7060 et. seq. with respect to each such unit;
provided, however, that a unit classified as a residential unit
under chapter 41 of the [San Francisco Administrative Code]
which is vacated under this subsection may not be put to any use
other than that of a residential hotel unit without compliance
with the provisions of [San Francisco Administrative Code]
§ 41.9.”
      The relevant portions of the termination notice addressing
relocation assistance payments were as follows. On page 1, the
termination notice provided, “You have rights and obligations
under [Rent Ordinance] § 37.9A, including, but not limited to, the
right to renew the tenancy if proper notification is given within
30 days after vacating the unit, and entitlement to certain
relocation payments as described in more detail below. A true
and correct copy of [Rent Ordinance] § 37.9A is attached hereto
as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. You are
hereby notified of your rights as set forth in Exhibit A.” At page
5, the termination notice stated, “You have rights to relocation
assistance payments as follows: [¶] Each tenant of the premises
shall be entitled to receive $6,985.23, one-half of which shall be
paid at the time of the service of the notice of termination of
tenancy, and one-half of which shall be paid when the tenant
vacates the unit. In the event there are more than three tenants