2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)

Citation: 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
Parent Document: 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2022-08-31
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/7861646/2710-sutter-ventures-llc-v-millis/ ↗

Full Text

1,305 chars

4
in a unit, the total relocation payment shall be $20,955.68, which
shall be divided equally by the number of tenants in the unit. If
any tenant is 62 years of age or older, or if any tenant is disabled
within the meaning of Section 12955.3 of the California
Government Code, such tenant shall be entitled to receive an
additional supplemental payment of $4,656.81, one-half of which
shall be paid within fifteen (15) calendar days of the landlord’s
receipt of written notice from the tenant of entitlement to the
supplemental relocation payment, and one-half of which shall be
paid when the tenant vacates the unit.” Plaintiffs attached as an
exhibit the applicable version of Rent Ordinance section 37.9A
and a copy of the San Francisco Rent Stabilization and
Arbitration Board’s form entitled, “Relocation Payments for
Tenants Evicted Under the Ellis Act.”
      Defendants demurred to the plaintiffs’ operative first
amended complaint. As is relevant here, defendants argued their
demurrer should be sustained because the termination notice was
defective in two respects: (1) it quoted a superseded version of
section 37.9, subdivision (a)(13) (section 37.9(a)(13)) as the
ground for eviction, thus providing an inaccurate ground for
eviction4; and (2) the termination notice did not properly advise

Other Sections in This Document (66)

Full Text