2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)

Citation: 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
Parent Document: 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2022-08-31
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/7861646/2710-sutter-ventures-llc-v-millis/ ↗

Full Text

1,042 chars

5
defendants of the right to relocation assistance payments because
it incorrectly referenced a superseded section of the Rent
Ordinance regarding relocation payments.
      After argument at the hearing on the demurrer, the trial
court announced that it would sustain the demurrer and
explained the basis for its ruling. The trial court accepted the
defendants’ argument that strict compliance with notice
provisions was required in the unlawful detainer suit, and found
for defendants due to the following faults in the plaintiffs’
termination notice: (1) the termination notice quoted an outdated
2004 version of section 37.9(a)(13) as the ground for eviction; and
2) the termination notice did not provide the required
information regarding the right to receive relocation payments.
The court instructed defendants’ counsel to prepare an order that
complied with the court’s oral pronouncement and to send the
order to plaintiffs’ counsel for approval. The final written order
of the court contained the following language: “IT IS HEREBY

Other Sections in This Document (66)

Full Text