2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)

Citation: 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
Parent Document: 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2022-08-31
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/7861646/2710-sutter-ventures-llc-v-millis/ ↗

Full Text

1,484 chars

1
Government Code section 7060.6 for plaintiffs’ purported failure
to comply with section 37.9A(e)(4); (3) the trial court improperly
found that plaintiffs’ notice of termination had to strictly comply
with section 37.9A(e)(4); and (4) plaintiffs should be allowed to
amend their complaint to state a cause of action for ejectment.
We find plaintiffs’ arguments unavailing and affirm.
                         BACKGROUND
      Plaintiffs own a three-unit residential rental property in
San Francisco and invoked the Act.2 Defendants Sean Millis and
Michelle Mattera are long-term tenants of one unit owned by
plaintiffs at 2710 Sutter Street (the premises). Plaintiffs pled,
based on information and belief, that Millis entered into a
tenancy agreement for the premises with plaintiffs’ predecessor
in 1995. In 1999, Millis entered into a written tenancy
agreement with plaintiffs’ predecessor; plaintiffs further alleged,
based on information and belief, that Mattera moved into the
premises as a co-tenant in 2005. Plaintiffs alleged that
defendants are the only occupants of the premises and the only
persons entitled to relocation assistance payments under the
Rent Ordinance.
      On November 13, 2019, plaintiffs served defendants with a
120-Day Notice of Termination of Tenancy (the termination
notice) and half of the relocation assistance payments due to
defendants under the Rent Ordinance. In response to the
termination notice, defendants both claimed disability status,

Other Sections in This Document (66)

Full Text