2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- Citation
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- Parent Document
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- Jurisdiction
- California (state)
- Effective Date
- 2022-08-31
Other Sections in This Document (66)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
- 2710 Sutter Ventures, LLC v. Millis (2022)
Full Text
1,675 chars28 (Dis. opn. post, at p. 3) Under this theory, for example, notice of the right to additional relocation assistance payments based on elderly and disabled status would be required only if the tenant at issue were, in fact, elderly or disabled. But Johnson forecloses such an interpretation. There, the court held that the Act preempted the “belief requirement” in the then-operative version of section 37.9A(e)(4), which required landlords to notify tenants of “ ‘the amount of [relocation assistance] payment which the landlord believes to be due.’ ” (Johnson, supra, 137 Cal.App.4th at pp. 11, 16, italics added.) Because this belief requirement put the burden on the landlord to, in essence, personalize the notice by stating whether the tenants were entitled to payment based on their age or disability—information potentially unknown to the landlord—and there was a substantive defense to eviction for violation of this requirement, the belief requirement placed a prohibitive price on the landlord’s right to exit the rental market and was preempted. (Id. at pp. 16–18.) Plaintiffs have claimed in this appeal that, similar to a landlord’s lack of knowledge regarding whether a tenant is elderly or disabled, a landlord may lack knowledge regarding whether certain “Eligible Tenants,” including children, live in the rental accommodations. The current section 37.9A(e)(4) provides a simple mechanism that provides tenants with information regarding the full scope of the right to relocation assistance payments under section 37.9A, subdivision (e)(1), (2), or (3); enables tenants to claim entitlement to the relocation assistance benefits that must be paid on behalf