Section 20
- Citation
- Section 20
- Parent Document
- WEA Crestwood Plaza, L.L.C. v. Flamers Charburgers, Inc., 24 S.W.3d 1 (2000)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 2000-01-11
Other Sections in This Document (101)
- WEA Crestwood Plaza, L.L.C. v. Flamers Charburgers, Inc., 24 S.W.3d 1 (2000)
- WEA Crestwood Plaza, L.L.C. v. Flamers Charburgers, Inc., 24 S.W.3d 1 (2000)
- WEA Crestwood Plaza, L.L.C. v. Flamers Charburgers, Inc., 24 S.W.3d 1 (2000)
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
Full Text
504 charsSecond, it is well-settled in Missouri that a party can bring successive claims on the same contract for damages that have not accrued as of the time of entry of judgment in the prior action. A subsequent suit constitutes a new and separate cause of action, which is not barred by res judicata, and does not violate the rule against splitting a single cause of action. See Finley v. St. John’s Mercy Medical Center, 958 S.W.2d 593, 595 (Mo.App. E.D.1998); Korte Construction Co. v. Deaconess Manor Assn.,