Section 20
- Citation
- Section 20
- Parent Document
- WEA Crestwood Plaza, L.L.C. v. Flamers Charburgers, Inc., 24 S.W.3d 1 (2000)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 2000-01-11
Other Sections in This Document (101)
- WEA Crestwood Plaza, L.L.C. v. Flamers Charburgers, Inc., 24 S.W.3d 1 (2000)
- WEA Crestwood Plaza, L.L.C. v. Flamers Charburgers, Inc., 24 S.W.3d 1 (2000)
- WEA Crestwood Plaza, L.L.C. v. Flamers Charburgers, Inc., 24 S.W.3d 1 (2000)
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
- Section 20
Full Text
563 chars998 S.W.2d at 126. The record here fails to indicate that the trial court gave the parties such notice. In cases such as this one, however, where the asserted basis for the motion was res judicata and related arguments, the relevant material from the underlying case was before the trial court, an eviden-tiary hearing was held, and the parties have not suggested any other documents were necessary to decide the question, it is appropriate for us to treat the judgment as a summary judgment. Id. See also Chaney v. Cooper, 954 S.W.2d 510, 515 (Mo.App. W.D.1997).