Section 20

Citation: Section 20
Parent Document: WEA Crestwood Plaza, L.L.C. v. Flamers Charburgers, Inc., 24 S.W.3d 1 (2000)
Jurisdiction: Missouri (state)
Effective Date: 2000-01-11
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1666841/wea-crestwood-plaza-llc-v-flame... ↗

Other Sections in This Document (101)

WEA Crestwood Plaza, L.L.C. v. Flamers Charburgers, Inc., 24 S.W.3d 1 (2000)
WEA Crestwood Plaza, L.L.C. v. Flamers Charburgers, Inc., 24 S.W.3d 1 (2000)
WEA Crestwood Plaza, L.L.C. v. Flamers Charburgers, Inc., 24 S.W.3d 1 (2000)
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20
Section 20

Full Text

486 chars

First, the availability of the special statutory remedy for rent and possession does not preclude a landlord from bringing successive suits against a defaulting tenant on one or more installments as they become due, because the principle of res judicata bars relitigation only of issues that actually were decided or could have been properly raised and decided in the previous suit. See Terre Du Lac, 737 S.W.2d at 212; Hurwitz v. Kohm, 594 S.W.2d at 645. Section 535.060 RSMo provides: