Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Carl v. Children's Hospital, 702 A.2d 159 (1997)

Citation
Carl v. Children's Hospital, 702 A.2d 159 (1997) (1)
Parent Document
Carl v. Children's Hospital, 702 A.2d 159 (1997)
Jurisdiction
DC (municipal)
Effective Date
1997-09-23

Other Sections in This Document (617)

Full Text

686 chars
(1) the extent of the reliance of the parties on the old rule (including the degree of justifiable reliance and the hardship which might result to the litigants as a result of retrospective application); (2) avoidance of altering vested contract or property rights; (3) the desire to reward plaintiffs who seek to initiate just changes in the law; and (4) the fear of burdening the administration of justice by disturbing decisions reached under the overruled precedent. Id. . See D.C.Code § 28:2-302 (1996 Repl.). . See U.C.C. § 2-302 cmt. 1, 1A U.L.A. 16 (1989). . See Edwards v. Habib, supra note 9. . See D.C.Code § 45-2552 (1996 Repl.). . See Mendes, supra note 3, 389 A.2d at 787.