§ 39
- Citation
- § 39
- Parent Document
- Redman v. POTOMAC PLACE ASSOCIATES, LLC, 972 A.2d 316 (2009)
- Jurisdiction
- DC (municipal)
- Effective Date
- 2009-05-28
Other Sections in This Document (61)
- Redman v. POTOMAC PLACE ASSOCIATES, LLC, 972 A.2d 316 (2009)
- Redman v. POTOMAC PLACE ASSOCIATES, LLC, 972 A.2d 316 (2009)
- Redman v. POTOMAC PLACE ASSOCIATES, LLC, 972 A.2d 316 (2009)
- Redman v. POTOMAC PLACE ASSOCIATES, LLC, 972 A.2d 316 (2009)
- Redman v. POTOMAC PLACE ASSOCIATES, LLC, 972 A.2d 316 (2009)
- § 1904
- § 1904
- § 1904
- § 1904
- § 1904
- § 1904
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
Full Text
203 chars. Ms. Redman also claimed retaliatory eviction as a defense to Potomac's action for possession, and argued that the trial court should have granted a stay under our decision in Drayton v. Poretsky Mgmt.,