§ 1904
- Citation
- § 1904
- Parent Document
- Redman v. POTOMAC PLACE ASSOCIATES, LLC, 972 A.2d 316 (2009)
- Jurisdiction
- DC (municipal)
- Effective Date
- 2009-05-28
Other Sections in This Document (61)
- Redman v. POTOMAC PLACE ASSOCIATES, LLC, 972 A.2d 316 (2009)
- Redman v. POTOMAC PLACE ASSOCIATES, LLC, 972 A.2d 316 (2009)
- Redman v. POTOMAC PLACE ASSOCIATES, LLC, 972 A.2d 316 (2009)
- Redman v. POTOMAC PLACE ASSOCIATES, LLC, 972 A.2d 316 (2009)
- Redman v. POTOMAC PLACE ASSOCIATES, LLC, 972 A.2d 316 (2009)
- § 1904
- § 1904
- § 1904
- § 1904
- § 1904
- § 1904
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
Full Text
742 charsMs. Redman chose not to purchase her dwelling unit, yet she did not vacate by the September 30, 2006, deadline. On October 5, 2006, Potomac filed a complaint for possession of Ms. Redman’s dwelling unit in the Landlord and Tenant Branch of the Superior Court. On November 14, 2006, Ms. Redman filed an answer raising various defenses then potentially available to her. Two days later, on November 16, 2006, the amendment protecting disabled tenants became effective, and she raised this new defense in her opposition to Potomac’s subsequent summary judgment motion. The trial court rejected all of Ms. Redman’s arguments and granted judgment for possession in favor of Potomac. *318 Ms. Redman was eventually evicted on December 11, 2007. II.