§ 42-3402
- Citation
- § 42-3402
- Parent Document
- Redman v. POTOMAC PLACE ASSOCIATES, LLC, 972 A.2d 316 (2009)
- Jurisdiction
- DC (municipal)
- Effective Date
- 2009-05-28
Other Sections in This Document (61)
- Redman v. POTOMAC PLACE ASSOCIATES, LLC, 972 A.2d 316 (2009)
- Redman v. POTOMAC PLACE ASSOCIATES, LLC, 972 A.2d 316 (2009)
- Redman v. POTOMAC PLACE ASSOCIATES, LLC, 972 A.2d 316 (2009)
- Redman v. POTOMAC PLACE ASSOCIATES, LLC, 972 A.2d 316 (2009)
- Redman v. POTOMAC PLACE ASSOCIATES, LLC, 972 A.2d 316 (2009)
- § 1904
- § 1904
- § 1904
- § 1904
- § 1904
- § 1904
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
Full Text
358 charsAfter September 30, 2006, Ms. Redman occupied the position of a tenant whose landlord had stated a statutorily sufficient reason to recover possession, who had received sufficient notice to vacate, but who refused to leave. As such, she was not “entitled” to continued possession of the unit. D.C.Code § 42-3401.03(17); see Hinton v. Sealander Brokerage Co.,