Redman v. POTOMAC PLACE ASSOCIATES, LLC, 972 A.2d 316 (2009)
- Citation
- Redman v. POTOMAC PLACE ASSOCIATES, LLC, 972 A.2d 316 (2009)
- Parent Document
- Redman v. POTOMAC PLACE ASSOCIATES, LLC, 972 A.2d 316 (2009)
- Jurisdiction
- DC (municipal)
- Effective Date
- 2009-05-28
Other Sections in This Document (61)
- Redman v. POTOMAC PLACE ASSOCIATES, LLC, 972 A.2d 316 (2009)
- Redman v. POTOMAC PLACE ASSOCIATES, LLC, 972 A.2d 316 (2009)
- Redman v. POTOMAC PLACE ASSOCIATES, LLC, 972 A.2d 316 (2009)
- Redman v. POTOMAC PLACE ASSOCIATES, LLC, 972 A.2d 316 (2009)
- Redman v. POTOMAC PLACE ASSOCIATES, LLC, 972 A.2d 316 (2009)
- § 1904
- § 1904
- § 1904
- § 1904
- § 1904
- § 1904
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 42-3402
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
- § 39
Full Text
659 charsThe instant appeal arises from the efforts of appellee Potomac Place Associates, LLC (“Potomac”) to convert an apartment building from residential tenant housing to condominiums. Appellant Deborah Red-man (“Ms. Redman”) was a tenant in the building who claimed the right to continue in that capacity after conversion as a “disabled tenant” under an amendment to D.C.Code § 42-3402.08 that became effective only during the course of Potomac’s eviction action against her. We agree with the trial court that the amendment did not operate to benefit Ms. Redman because she was not in lawful possession of the premises at the time the statute became effective. I.