Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Section 327C

Citation
Section 327C
Parent Document
Skyline Village Park Ass'n v. Skyline Village L.P., 786 N.W.2d 304 (2010)
Jurisdiction
Minnesota (state)
Effective Date
2010-07-20

Other Sections in This Document (94)

Full Text

701 chars
Second, under appellant’s proposed construction, if a court were to determine— apparently by some unarticulated, non-rule-based method — that a rent increase is unreasonable, the rent increase would be subject to an evaluation of reasonableness under section 327C.01, subdivision 8. But if a determination of unreasonableness is necessary to transform a rent increase into a rule change, we discern no purpose in reevaluating the reasonableness of the re-suiting rule change a second time under section 327C.01, subdivision 8, particularly because different standards could produce conflicting results. Thus, appellant’s proposed construction yields an illogical and absurd result. Legislative History