DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Skyline Village Park Ass'n v. Skyline Village L.P., 786 N.W.2d 304 (2010)

Citation
Skyline Village Park Ass'n v. Skyline Village L.P., 786 N.W.2d 304 (2010)
Parent Document
Skyline Village Park Ass'n v. Skyline Village L.P., 786 N.W.2d 304 (2010)
Jurisdiction
Minnesota (state)
Effective Date
2010-07-20
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1602295/skyline-village-park-assn-v-sky... ↗

Other Sections in This Document (94)

Full Text

423 chars 
741 N.W.2d 117, 122 (Minn.2007). When interpreting a statute, our object is to “ascertain and effectuate the intention of the legislature.” Minn.Stat. § 645.16 (2008). “[An appellate court] first look[s] to see whether the statute’s language, on its face, is clear or ambiguous. A statute is ambiguous only when the language therein is subject to more than one reasonable interpretation.” Am. Family Ins. Group v. Schroedl,