DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Section 327C

Citation
Section 327C
Parent Document
Skyline Village Park Ass'n v. Skyline Village L.P., 786 N.W.2d 304 (2010)
Jurisdiction
Minnesota (state)
Effective Date
2010-07-20
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1602295/skyline-village-park-assn-v-sky... ↗

Other Sections in This Document (94)

Full Text

576 chars 
Given the statutory scheme set forth in chapter 327, we agree with respondents’ assertion that “the completeness and detail with which the [legislature addressed rent leads one to conclude that had the [ljegis-lature wanted to address rent increase controls, it would have done so expressly.” The legislature’s failure to impose an express “reasonableness” requirement on rent increases in its enumeration of rent increase restrictions in section 327C.06 indicates that the legislature did not intend to impose a reasonableness restriction. See Underwood Grain Co. v. Harthun,