Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Skyline Village Park Ass'n v. Skyline Village L.P., 786 N.W.2d 304 (2010)

Citation
Skyline Village Park Ass'n v. Skyline Village L.P., 786 N.W.2d 304 (2010)
Parent Document
Skyline Village Park Ass'n v. Skyline Village L.P., 786 N.W.2d 304 (2010)
Jurisdiction
Minnesota (state)
Effective Date
2010-07-20

Other Sections in This Document (94)

Full Text

315 chars
Appellant argues that we should interpret section 327C.02, subdivision 2, as imposing a reasonableness requirement on rent increases. Appellant contends that under section 327C.02, subdivision 2, an unreasonable rent increase is a rule change that must comply with the statutory requirements governing rule changes.