Skyline Village Park Ass'n v. Skyline Village L.P., 786 N.W.2d 304 (2010)

Citation: Skyline Village Park Ass'n v. Skyline Village L.P., 786 N.W.2d 304 (2010)
Parent Document: Skyline Village Park Ass'n v. Skyline Village L.P., 786 N.W.2d 304 (2010)
Jurisdiction: Minnesota (state)
Effective Date: 2010-07-20
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1602295/skyline-village-park-assn-v-sky... ↗

Full Text

656 chars

Appellant emphasizes the need to give effect to all of the provisions in section 327C.02, subdivision 2, and argues that we must give meaning to the word “reasonable” in the phrase “reasonable rent increase made in compliance with section 327C.06.” Appellant asserts that interpreting the word “reasonable” to mean nothing more than compliance with section 327C.06 renders the word superfluous. Appellant argues that we must instead give effect to the word by interpreting section 327C.02, subdivision 2, to mean that “rent increases must be reasonable and those which are not are subject to limitations in [s]ections 327C.01[,] subdivision 8 and 327C.02.”

Other Sections in This Document (94)

Full Text