DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Skyline Village Park Ass'n v. Skyline Village L.P., 786 N.W.2d 304 (2010)

Citation
Skyline Village Park Ass'n v. Skyline Village L.P., 786 N.W.2d 304 (2010)
Parent Document
Skyline Village Park Ass'n v. Skyline Village L.P., 786 N.W.2d 304 (2010)
Jurisdiction
Minnesota (state)
Effective Date
2010-07-20
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1602295/skyline-village-park-assn-v-sky... ↗

Other Sections in This Document (94)

Full Text

393 chars 
Minn.Stat. § 327C.02 (2008). Appellant argued that the increase is unreasonable because (1) it set the rent at a level substantially higher than that of other comparable parks in the region, (2) it is part of a 23%-24% rent increase over the course of four years, and (3) requested repairs and maintenance had not been completed in the park. Appellant sought declaratory and injunctive relief.