Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Skyline Village Park Ass'n v. Skyline Village L.P., 786 N.W.2d 304 (2010)

Citation
Skyline Village Park Ass'n v. Skyline Village L.P., 786 N.W.2d 304 (2010)
Parent Document
Skyline Village Park Ass'n v. Skyline Village L.P., 786 N.W.2d 304 (2010)
Jurisdiction
Minnesota (state)
Effective Date
2010-07-20

Other Sections in This Document (94)

Full Text

602 chars
Appellant challenges the district court’s declaratory judgment in favor of respondents, arguing that the district court’s ruling is based on an erroneous interpretation of Minnesota Statutes, chapter 327C. Because the district court correctly determined that section 327C.02, subdivision 2, does not impose a reasonableness requirement on increases in manufactured-home-park-lot rental rates and that section 327C.05, subdivision 1, which prohibits a park owner from engaging in an unreasonable course of conduct, does not apply to increases in manufactured-home-park-lot rental rates, we affirm. FACTS