Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Citation
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Parent Document
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 2024-06-11
Other Sections in This Document (77)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
- Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
Full Text
2,366 charsSpecifically, the plaintiff alleged in relevant part that
Cruz complained to the plaintiff that his supervisor ‘‘was
racially discriminating against him by declining to enter
his overtime into the department’s payroll system.’’ The
plaintiff alleged that he ‘‘immediately reported the com-
plaint’’ to his supervisor and provided Cruz with advice
regarding who to contact for further assistance. The
plaintiff also alleged that, ‘‘[i]n September, 2017, [Cruz]
filed an administrative complaint with the [CHRO] relat-
ing to his belief that he was the victim of unlawful racial
discrimination,’’ and the plaintiff ‘‘supported [Cruz’] fil-
ing of the complaint and attempted to protect him from
further discrimination . . . .’’
As to his testimony, the plaintiff alleged that, on Octo-
ber 23, 2018, ‘‘[he] testified in a deposition for [Cruz’]
CHRO complaint against the defendant. His testimony
supported [Cruz’] allegations,’’ and, on December 20,
2019, he ‘‘completed a second deposition on behalf of
[Cruz], testifying favorably for him and against the
defendant.’’ (Emphasis added.) In the relevant counts
of the plaintiff’s complaint, the plaintiff also specifically
alleged that the defendant actively discouraged him
from complying with his obligation ‘‘to report and pre-
vent racial discrimination.’’
We conclude that these allegations, taken together,
necessarily imply that the plaintiff’s deposition testi-
mony supported Cruz’ discrimination claim. See Doe
v. Cochran, supra, 332 Conn. 333 (considering facts
‘‘necessarily implied’’ from allegations); see also Mercer
v. Champion, 139 Conn. App. 216, 232, 55 A.3d 772
(2012) (when taken together, facts necessarily implied
from plaintiff’s allegations were sufficient to satisfy stat-
utory requirement). We emphasize that we must con-
strue the allegations ‘‘broadly and realistically, rather
than narrowly and technically’’; (internal quotation
marks omitted) Sepega v. DeLaura, supra, 326 Conn.
791; and that we must construe them in the manner
Page 20 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL 0, 0