Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)

Citation
Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
Parent Document
Michel v. Hartford, 226 Conn. App. 98 (2024)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2024-06-11

Other Sections in This Document (77)

Full Text

758 chars
2018, ‘‘the plaintiff testified on behalf of [Cruz] at a fact-finding hearing
         before the [CHRO]’’ and then, on December 20, 2019, the plaintiff provided
         deposition testimony in connection with a federal discrimination lawsuit
         that Cruz had filed. The court appears to have obtained these facts from
         the plaintiff’s opposition to the defendant’s motion to strike. The plaintiff’s
         operative complaint, however, alleges that the plaintiff’s October 23, 2018
         testimony was provided in the context of a deposition for Cruz’ CHRO
         complaint, not at a fact-finding hearing, and that his December 20, 2019
0, 0                         CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL                                       Page 5