Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)

Citation: Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
Parent Document: Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
Jurisdiction: Connecticut (state)
Effective Date: 2025-01-28
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10320924/brook-run-development-corp-v-noon/ ↗

Full Text

637 chars

12
               In conclusory fashion, the defendant appears to challenge the court’s
          determination that she was a tenant at sufferance. The defendant does not
          challenge the court’s determination that, as a tenant at sufferance, her refusal
          to pay a fair and equitable rent increase constitutes good cause for eviction
          under §47a-23c. Instead, she simply relies on her primary claim that the
          lease did not terminate. Because we already have rejected this primary
          claim, and this secondary, conclusory claim is not otherwise adequately
          briefed, we do not address it.

Other Sections in This Document (35)

Full Text