Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)

Citation: Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
Parent Document: Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
Jurisdiction: Connecticut (state)
Effective Date: 2025-01-28
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10320924/brook-run-development-corp-v-noon/ ↗

Full Text

693 chars

Nevertheless, the defendant argues that ‘‘us’’ as used
       in paragraph 10 (A) of the lease refers to both parties
       126; see also Winslow v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co., 188 U.S. 646, 655,
       23 S. Ct. 443, 47 L. Ed. 635 (1903) (‘‘[t]here must be some peculiar and plain
       language before it will be assumed that the parties intended to create [a
       perpetuity]’’); Leone v. Sharron, Superior Court, judicial district of New
       London, Docket No. CV-XX-XXXXXXX-S (October 22, 2015) (61 Conn. L. Rptr.
       177, 177–78) (applying Lonergan to similar lease provision).
Page 10                        CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL                                     0, 0

Other Sections in This Document (35)

Full Text