Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)

Citation: Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
Parent Document: Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
Jurisdiction: Connecticut (state)
Effective Date: 2025-01-28
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10320924/brook-run-development-corp-v-noon/ ↗

Full Text

1,080 chars

marks omitted.) Noroton Heights Shopping Center, Inc.
          v. Phil’s Grill, LLC, 207 Conn. App. 211, 220, 262 A.3d
          970, cert. denied, 339 Conn. 920, 262 A.3d 137 (2021).
          We cannot construe the lease to bind the plaintiff to
          the defendant unless the defendant agrees to allow the
          plaintiff not to renew the lease or she decides to vacate
          the premises upon the conclusion of a lease term. This
          interpretation would hand over to the defendant, and,
          by operation of paragraph 22, to her heirs and assigns,
          complete control over the plaintiff’s property—an
          untenable result.
            For all the foregoing reasons, we conclude that the
          language of the lease is clear and unambiguous as a
          matter of law and that the court properly determined
          that the defendant’s lease with the plaintiff had termi-
          nated. The defendant’s claim, therefore, fails.12
               The judgment is affirmed.
               In this opinion the other judges concurred.

Other Sections in This Document (35)

Full Text