Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)

Citation: Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
Parent Document: Brook Run Development Corp. v. Noon, 230 Conn. App. 424 (2025)
Jurisdiction: Connecticut (state)
Effective Date: 2025-01-28
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10320924/brook-run-development-corp-v-noon/ ↗

Full Text

783 chars

ELGO, J. In this summary process action, the defen-
         dant Kristine Noon appeals from the judgment of the
         trial court in favor of the plaintiff, Brook Run Develop-
         ment Corp.1 On appeal, the defendant claims that the
            1
              The original defendants in this case were Kristine Noon, her brother
         William Henninger, and John Doe and Jane Doe. The plaintiff withdrew the
         cause of action against John Doe and Jane Doe on July 5, 2023. Because
         Noon was the original leaseholder, and Henninger moved into the residence
         after the lease was signed, we refer to Noon as the defendant throughout
         this opinion.
0, 0                        CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL                                    Page 1

Other Sections in This Document (35)

Full Text